9/11 and "Iran urges Russia to deliver overdue missiles"

A question: why would Russia's nomenklatura, the leaders - who are supposed to be 'doing their own thing' - refuse still - after nearly four years - to deliver the promised S-300 surface-to-air missiles to Iran?

Who profits?

"Iran urges Russia to deliver overdue missiles"

Moscow - November 13th 2009 (RIA Novosti) - A top Iranian military official on Friday urged Russia to honor its bilateral military contract and deliver the promised S-300 surface-to-air missiles, the Mehr news agency reported.

Gen. Hassan Firouzabadi said Russia was six months behind schedule with deliveries of advanced air-defense systems.

"Why haven't they delivered the S-300 missiles? Six months have now passed since they were supposed to deliver them," he said.

Russia signed a contract with Iran on the supply of S-300 air defense systems to the Islamic Republic in December 2005. However, there have been no official reports on the start of the contract's implementation since then.

The possible deliveries of S-300 missiles to Iran have aroused serious concern in the West and in Israel.

"Russia has to fulfill the contract and not be influenced by Zionist pressure," Firouzabadi said. A Russian government official on Thursday said Moscow would not freeze the contract as a concession to the United States."

LOL! The US/UK crimnal cartel's war machine managers have done this already since December 2005! - HR

RIA Novosti: "The official denied media speculations that Russia could freeze the Iranian contract in exchange for Washington's decision not to place interceptor missiles in Poland and a missile tracking radar in the Czech Republic.

The latest version of the S-300 series is the S-300PMU2 Favorit, which has a range of up to 195 kilometers (about 120 miles) and can intercept aircraft and ballistic missiles at altitudes from 10 meters to 27 kilometers.

It is considered one of the world's most effective all-altitude regional air defense systems, comparable in performance to the U.S. MIM-104 Patriot system.

Iranian Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi urged Russia on Wednesday to fulfill its contract on the supply of S-300 air defense systems to Iran."

[end story] - Source: Russian info agency RIA Novosti - Url.: http://en.rian.ru/world/20091113.../ 156823175.html

Now, why doesn't Russia - which is allowing US/NATO flights over its territory to illegally occupied Afghanistan - want Iran to better defend itself?

Why did in July this year many propaganda media - like the NSA/CIA's funded 'Voice of America' - write that: "Russia Supports US War Effort in Afghanistan"?

Quote VOA: "Russia has agreed to cooperate with the United States in Afghanistan. The agreement gives the United States the right to fly over Russian territory as it transports military equipment and personnel to support American and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

The White House says the accord will permit 4,500 flights per year, saving the U.S. government $133 million annually in fuel, maintenance and other transportation costs. In addition, the Russians have waived any air navigation charges. 



During a Moscow news conference on July 6 following talks with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev, U.S. President Barack Obama hailed the agreement.

"This is a substantial contribution by Russia to our international effort, and it will save the United States time and resources in giving our troops the support they need," he said."

[end quote] - Source: NSA/CIA's 'Voice of America' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/ycwdtab

Food for thought, isn't it?

I smell a huge rat.

HR

11.13.09

Henk R. I smell a huge rat, too.

As you always say, "connect the dots".

Thanks for good post.

michelle | 11.13.09 - 11:23 am

-0-

Just another one:

Why has none of the so called 'big' leaders of China or Russia, Australia, the also 'dark brown' European Union, India or Brazil for instance - asked for an independent investigation of the inside job of 9/11?

Or, what we thought of as 'moral knights' in mine or your country: haven't the mainstream media reported anything concerning them?

By the way, concerning 9/11: I saw an interesting piece about this some years ago, which you may wonder about as well: Quote: "I just cannot accept that he had some kind of "psychic feeling" beforehand. It just does not sound right in a world where leaders get intelligence briefings every day of their lives. I think PUTIN KNEW SOMETHING SPECIFIC BEFOREHAND.

I think people should consider the possibility that Putin knew EXACTLY that 9/11 was going to happen.

I have long said in all my articles that Russia and China are the world"s biggest sponsors of terrorism.

The history of Asia, Africa, the Middle East and South America are replete with examples of Russians sponsoring Marxists, and of the Russians sponsoring those Arabs who HATE AMERICA WITH A PASSION.

Is it too much to ask if there is a Russian link to 9/11?

I think not. And it is something I have been quietly wondering about ever since this thing happened. Listening to Putin speaking, definitely makes me feel that this is a line of investigation Americans should seriously pursue." - [end excerpt] - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/yb6jqcy

Of course I don't agree with everything he says, but it's quite intriguing. But, knowing the UK media somewhat I don't trust any of them.

But fir instance the Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez - as more and more do every day - said it aloud: "U.S. may have planned 9/11" - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/yf82zjd

Maybe because Chavez - like some others - tries to be independent too?

As they say in the US: 9/11 absolutely doesn't pass the smell test.

Or in Sweden: There's a dog buried...

Just connecting the dots.

.