Saturday, December 12, 2009

COPENHAGEN CLIMATEGATE: "AL GORE LIED AND THE PEOPLE DIED."

COPENHAGEN CLIMATEGATE: "AL GORE LIED AND THE PEOPLE DIED."

Global warming fake:

Hide the decline in temperature in the hacked emails stopped the planned $,£, € etc billions go to the rich cartel?

December 12th 2009 - Because Al Gore, who didn't dare to show up in Copenhagen, lied and the people died. As Ben Lieberman wrote: ‘Climategate’ should derail Copenhagen climate conference - Green Bay Press-Gazette - December 12, 2009 - Is it a good thing that delegates from the United States and 191 other countries have convened a U.N. conference in Copenhagen to work on a new global-warming treaty?

Well, it’s good to the extent that warming is a real problem. But the “climategate” scandal — the release of e-mails and other documents indicating gross misconduct among key scientists — suggests otherwise.

Climategate offers one more reason America should avoid a costly deal at Copenhagen.

The scandal implicates a number of scientists who helped draft the U.N.’s 2007 global warming report, which is often cited as near-proof of a global warming crisis. This report is the official U.N. scientific basis for the Copenhagen conference. Among other things, these scientists admit to manipulating the data to show recent warming as unusual.


One, Phil Jones (who has since resigned his post at the University of East Anglia pending an investigation), referred to a “trick” he and others have used to “hide the decline.” Talk about an inconvenient truth. Worse, the computer programs these scientists used were designed to add more of a warming trend to the actual measurements.

In many other cases, this clique of scientists went to extreme (and probably illegal) lengths to withhold what should have been publicly available temperature data.

Thus, we have only their admittedly manipulated temperature trends. The underlying measurements, on which independent researchers could do their own analysis, have not been made available. Jones also threatened to delete some of this data rather than hand it over — and in fact some of the older data already has been destroyed.


In their e-mails, these scientists also discuss keeping dissenting views from getting published, presumably to create a stronger facade of scientific certainty and unanimity.

Needless to say, scientists who had an open-and-shut case would hardly act this way. Indeed, this is hardly the conduct of persons who could call themselves scientists at all, as science is based on an honest, open debate, and on transparent results that can be reproduced.

Climategate is not the only reason for doubt. Another thing recently missing from the global warming debate is ... global warming.

Temperatures have been flat for more than a decade. Ironically, the purpose of the Copenhagen conference is to replace the supposedly inadequate provisions in the 1997 Kyoto global warming treaty, but temperatures have barely budged since then.


Another scientist, Kevin Trenberth, admitted in one of the released e-mails that “we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.” Actually the travesty is that such doubts were largely kept private while the opposite was said in public and in the 2007 U.N. report, even though the non-warming trend was well underway by then.


On one aspect of global warming there is little dispute: addressing global warming by reducing carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels will cost money and jobs. The Copenhagen proposals would amount to a massive new energy tax, the last thing our still-weak economy needs.

We wouldn’t rush to execute a convicted killer just after learning that his main accusers committed perjury. We shouldn’t do the same to the economy in order to combat the increasingly questionable threat of global warming. The U.S. should agree to nothing in Copenhagen until we get to the bottom of climategate. We need to find out for certain how much of the case for global warming we can still trust." - [end article] - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/y9wl6ef

It is a global scam, with all the wealth going to the wealthy via funds etc. -

AP (Assorted Propaganda) of course - like the criminal cartel's all propaganda media - tags along, but has to name the amounts being 'promised' by the totalitarian European Union already:

"News of the document came as the European Union leaders agreed in Brussels to commit $3.6 billion a year until 2012 to a short-term fund to help poor countries cope with climate change.

Most of the money came from Britain, France and Germany. Many cash-strapped former East bloc countries balked at donating but eventually all gave at least a token amount to preserve the 27-nation bloc’s unity." - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/y8w3xmx

All those so called 'experts' and 'scientists' bought by the rich for the rich! And the tax payer as always gets the bills, so they can pay forever in the usury web of debt.

The hegemony the criminal cartel wants is according to Ex-UN envoy Ziegler, and that's one of the best articles concerning this I've ever seen: "An absurd, murderous world order." - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/yaqyu3r

This cartel humanoids are global usury crooks, war profiteers from the blood, sweat and tears of humanity.

This is what they do, and it's understandable that photographer Kevin Carter committed suicide some time after taking the picture. - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/6x59ms

They themselves are climatological Weapons of Mass Destruction too.

Related is also the ‘smear campaign’ known as Climategate by Steve Bankhead:

Friday, Dec 11th, 2009 - A Dec. 5 San Francisco Chronicle story on page 8 discussed recent news of leaked e-mails from England’s University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit revealing efforts to bolster evidence of human-caused global warming through use of statistical “tricks,” plus strategies to discredit and ostracize anyone reporting conflicting results. The story itself described the leak as ”stolen files,” a “criminal breach,” and a “politically-motivated smear campaign.”

At risk of sounding cynical, I doubt those descriptions would be used if the leaked information had, instead, regarded industry-funded researchers discussing the difficulty in disproving anthropogenic global warming. Also, the possibility of the e-mails being leaked by an insider is rarely mentioned, since that would change the culprit’s image from a sinister hacker to a noble whistleblower.

And criticism of the e-mails being “cherry-picked” is ironic, since one thing they indicate is that research data had been cherry-picked to preserve the image of increasing temperatures.

News reports on details of the messages themselves have been so scant and back-page they might be referred to as the greatest story never told. Considering the stakes, however, it’s obvious why there might be a concerted effort to kill the messenger. With Congress considering a massive carbon tax and the climate change convention in Copenhagen seeking hundreds of billions of dollars from developed nations for redistribution to climate programs around the world, this is a sticky moment for release of information indicating the “proof” of anthropogenic global warming might be founded, at least partly, on fraud.

I began offering opinions dissenting with dogmatic beliefs that humans are the cause of global warming with an August 1996 column. That was way back when the Earth was still actually warming. Part of the frustration among global warming activists is that global temperatures flattened after 1998 and now appear to be declining. Since that’s been reported by both the British Broadcasting Corporation and Germany’s Der Spiegel, those sources must also be conspirators in the smear campaign.

The pause in warming should come as no surprise to anyone familiar with the phenomenon known as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, which is a roughly 30-year Pacific Ocean warming and cooling cycle. The last cooling period, from 1945 to 1977, left many activists warning of a coming ice age and the need for drastic government actions. The only constant from then until now is the call for greater government control of our freedoms and economy.

My columns over the years examined inconvenient facts regarding causes of climate variation, such as ice core samples taken at the Russian Vostok station in Antarctica, which created a graph of rising and falling global temperatures and carbon dioxide levels occurring in 100,000-year cycles, almost steady as a heartbeat. We’re simply at that cycle’s most recent spike, and there are even longer cycles beyond that.

Equally hard to ignore are research results indicating CO2 levels appear to trail temperature variations by many decades, which would mean CO2 is an effect, not the cause of those variations. If so, taking extreme and economically crippling measures to control CO2 in order to control temperatures seems like trying to slow a horse by decreasing the load it’s pulling.

Where Climategate goes from here is anyone’s guess, though the political response to it might be indicated by Sen. Barbara Boxer. As top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, she said “You call it Climategate; I call it E-mail-theft-gate,” and supports a criminal probe to find and punish the leakers. I agree with the senator regarding the need for a probe, but only if it’s independent and also investigates the possibility of her, Al Gore and fellow big government advocates attempting to rob freedoms and extort trillions of dollars from the American public with proposed carbon taxes and other drains on our economy by means of cooked statistics and fear-mongering.

Unfortunately, even if Congress balks on such actions, the Obama administration has the power to bypass the legislative branch entirely and acquire desired powers with an executive order through the Environmental Protection Agency.

A final concern is that policies being proposed would almost certainly result in skyrocketing prices for food, heating fuel, and other vital necessities, causing a steep rise in global human hardship. Perhaps the day will come when bumper stickers are printed saying, “Gore lied and people died.”

Steve Bankhead is a Watsonville resident and business owner. The opinions of columnists are not necessarily those of the Register-Pajaronian." - [and end] - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/yb2agz8

Take your pick concerning HR and why he got the Nobel Prize, the gory Al Gore - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/y968lxl

Showing that the base of Nobel's Peace Prize is not so noble at all.

It's a racket called war.


Henk Ruyssenaars


RELATED:

* Gore gets a cold shoulder - Url.: www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/10/13/1191696238792.html

* Nobel Prize For Al Gore: "Old Europe" Fires Back At The Bush Administration - Url.: www.countercurrents.org/martin131007.htm

* Definition of 'gore' on the Web: "bloodshed: the shedding of blood resulting in murder; he avenged the bloodshed of his kinsmen."

* ALFRED BERNHARD NOBEL was a Swedish chemist, engineer, innovator, armaments manufacturer and the inventor of dynamite. He owned Bofors, a major armaments manufacturer, which he had redirected from its previous role as an iron and steel mill. In his last will, he used his enormous fortune to institute the Nobel Prizes. - Url.: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Nobel

* 2006 NOBEL PEACE PRIZE CONCERT - Url.: thecelebritycafe.com/features/7977.html

* NOBEL'S EXPLOSIVE HERITAGE STILL IN THE SAME HANDS - SWEDEN: NOT

* ONLY SEX, SIN & SMÖRGÅSBORD - After an election the 'Volvo' 5 weeks ago changed color from reddish to blatant blue, but is still made and driven by the same group. - Url.: www.cemab.be/news/2006/09/1971_comment.php

* THE LONDON WAR LORDS & THE EVIL EMPIRE - Url.: tinyurl.com/hcrg7

* ALFRED NOBEL'S WILL - NOBEL INSTITUTE/ORGANISATION - Url.: nobelprize.org/alfred_nobel/will/will-full.html

* THE NOT-SO-NOBLE PRIZE - ASIAMEDIA - Monday, October 30, 2006 - An economist won the Nobel Peace Prize, but Vinay Lal is waiting for the day when a peace activist wins the Nobel Prize in economics. - Url.: www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/columns.asp

* CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN SOUTH AFRICA AND THE BOER WAR - article with documentation - Url.: library.stanford.edu/africa/boers.html

* KILLING AND DRILLING - SHELL and the Seven Sisters have blood on their hands - Url.: tinyurl.com/ybhfoc

* KISSINGER DIDN'T EVEN DARE TO PICK UP THE PEACE PRIZE - Url.: beirut.indymedia.org/ar/2005/12/3538.shtml

* RELATIVES OF LOBOTOMY PATIENTS WANT NOBEL PRIZE REVOKED - Associated Press - 14 July 2005 - Url.: www.livescience.com/humanbiology/ap_050714_lobotomy.html

* NOBEL PRIZE FOR LOBOTOMY - 1949: PROFESSOR EGAS MONIZ won the first Nobel Prize in Medicine for Portugal for developing the techniques of lobotomy, lobectomy and angiography. - The Odyssey of the Portuguese Jews - Url.: www.apol.net/dightonrock/odyssey_of_port_jews.htm

* PULITZER PRIZE FOR A HOLOCAUST DENIER - Url.: www.cemab.be/print.php

* GLOBAL POISONING BY DU TOO - Who makes us commit suicide? - Global suicide? - Url.:
melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/10/128567.php

* AFTER NOBEL THE GROUP STARTED ON THE 'MANHATTAN PROJECT' - Url.: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project

* The Dutch author this far has lived and worked abroad - never in an English speaking country - for more than 4 decades for international media as an independent foreign correspondent, of which 10 years - also during Gulf War I - in the Arab World and the Middle East. Seeing worldwide that every bullet and every bomb breeds more terrorism!

* FPF-COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 - any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the Foreign Press Foundation under fair use, without profit or payment, to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the information. Url.: liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/17/107.html

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
Editor: Henk Ruyssenaars
tinyurl.com/gpr4j
The Netherlands
fpf (at) chello.nl

-0-

.

No comments: